Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Case No. (Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division) Melody and Ronail Williams v. The cases before the multidistrict panel are: Stephanie Barnett and Chris Crawford v. 7 filing (In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, MDL-2434 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation)) that in at least one of the lawsuits, the discovery process has already begun, and transferring the case to a consolidated class could result in a duplicate recovery for some plaintiffs. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, the mammoth company who has manufactured the Mirena IUD since 1990, claimed through court documents filed in February that consolidating the cases would limit Bayer’s ability to defend the Mirena lawsuits individually. And, considering the number of women who use the device, it’s appears that the lawsuits may continue well into into the future,” says Adam Pulaski, a founding partner at Pulaski & Middleman, LLC, a nationwide law firm that represents victims of dangerous drugs and medical devices.Īccording to Pulaski, the firm will accept representation for those cases where the Mirena IUD migrated outside of the uterus, or perforated the uterine wall, intestines, or surrounding organs, or if the patient required surgery (with or without hospitalization), to remove the defective device.īayer, the manufacturer of the Mirena IUD, has requested all Mirena IUD lawsuits filed in federal courts not be consolidated into a single mass action suit. “We hear from hundreds of women each week who had to have the Mirena IUD surgically removed after the device migrated outside the uterus. Sometimes surgery is required to remove the IUD because it has migrated to other regions of the body.
These include perforations of the uterus, cervix and intestines. Some complications, however, are more serious and can lead to various other problems. Some listed side effects are somewhat minor, such as adhesions, infections, abscesses, and inflammation of the pelvis. According to the warning letter, many adverse side effects have been alleged in connection with the use of the Mirena IUD. In December, 2009, the FDA issued a warning letter to Bayer, criticizing the company for overstating the benefits of the Mirena IUD while downplaying its risks.
#PULASKI MIDDLEMAN FREE#
The title of the study, Removal of an intraabdominal Levonorgestrel-Releasing intrauterine Device, is available from the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology.Ĭlick Here for A Free Online Mirena IUD Case Evaluation
According to a Mastudy authored by David Peleg, MD and Richard Latta, MD of the Bradford Regional Medical Center in Bradford, PA, when the Mirena IUD migrates, it often causes tears through the wall of the uterus or becomes embedded within, requiring surgical removal.
0 kommentar(er)
